Diagnostics & progress

Report generated on 2026-07-14 03:17:11 UTC.

1899
Pairs generated
1899
Pairs evaluated
22350
Total possible pairs
8.50%
Generation complete
8.50%
Evaluations complete
2082-07-11
Projected generation completion Avg 1.0/day over last 14 days; 20451 remaining
2082-07-11
Projected evaluation completion Avg 1.0/day over last 14 days; 20451 remaining
43443231
Total tokens used Reasoning: 22792274
Other: 20650957

Evaluation score distribution

Evaluator v2

Total: 1899 · Avg: 5.94

  • 0
    1
  • 1
    0
  • 2
    173
  • 3
    5
  • 4
    44
  • 5
    79
  • 6
    620
  • 7
    794
  • 8
    182
  • 9
    1
  • 10
    0

Most recent arguments

IDPairGeneratedEvaluationExcerpt
189913 → 1122026-07-14T03:16:53Score 5.5 (v2) on 2026-07-14T03:17:07A plausible case is that **Psalm 112 reads like a wisdom-resolution of the crisis in Psalm 13**: what Psalm 13 asks for in anguish, Psalm 112 describes as the s
189813 → 1112026-07-13T03:17:51Score 4.8 (v2) on 2026-07-13T03:18:09On **strict rare-word overlap**, the case is only **moderate**: Psalm 13 and Psalm 111 do **not** share many rare identical lexemes. But on **form, sequence, an
189713 → 1102026-07-12T03:17:09Score 2.0 (v2) on 2026-07-12T03:17:18You can make a decent case, though the link is more **progressive/thematic** than simply “these two psalms use lots of the same rare words.” The strongest argum
189613 → 1092026-07-11T03:18:08Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-07-11T03:18:21Yes—though the case is stronger in **form, rhetoric, and narrative development** than in a dense cluster of rare shared words.
189513 → 1082026-07-10T03:17:26Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-07-10T03:17:35A good case can be made that **Psalm 108 reads like a natural sequel to Psalm 13**, especially if you treat Psalm 13’s final turn to trust as the launching poin
189413 → 1072026-07-09T03:17:45Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-07-09T03:18:03A good case can be made that **Psalm 107 is a fitting “next step” after Psalm 13**, even if not by direct quotation density. The strongest argument is that **Ps
189313 → 1062026-07-08T03:21:03Score 4.5 (v2) on 2026-07-08T03:21:17Yes. The best case is that Psalm 106 works as a **communal, historical expansion of Psalm 13**, especially of Psalm 13’s movement from **complaint → plea → conf
189213 → 1052026-07-07T03:17:34Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-07-07T03:17:43Yes—though the link is stronger **thematically and structurally** than by rare shared vocabulary alone.
189113 → 1042026-07-06T03:16:55Score 4.5 (v2) on 2026-07-06T03:17:11A good case can be made that **Psalm 104 is a kind of cosmic expansion of Psalm 13**.
189013 → 1032026-07-05T03:17:02Score 5.6 (v2) on 2026-07-05T03:17:13A good case can be made that **Psalm 103 works as a natural sequel to Psalm 13**, especially if you read Psalm 13 as a lament that has just turned toward trust,
188913 → 1022026-07-04T03:17:57Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-07-04T03:18:05A good case can be made that **Psalm 102 reads like an expanded sequel to Psalm 13**: it takes the short, acute **individual lament** of Psalm 13 and develops i
188813 → 1012026-07-03T03:17:11Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-07-03T03:17:23A plausible case is that **Psalm 101 reads like a sequel to Psalm 13**: the lamented, endangered David of Psalm 13 has been heard, and the restored/enthroned Da
188713 → 1002026-07-02T03:17:49Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-07-02T03:17:59If you wanted to argue that **Psalm 100 is a plausible sequel to Psalm 13**, the strongest case is **not** “these psalms share lots of rare identical words.” Th
188613 → 992026-07-01T03:19:16Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-07-01T03:19:27You can make a decent case, though the case is stronger thematically and liturgically than by lots of rare identical vocabulary.
188513 → 982026-06-30T03:18:07Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-30T03:18:16A good case can be made that **Psalm 98 reads like the answered, public, enlarged sequel to Psalm 13**.
188413 → 972026-06-29T03:21:27Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-29T03:21:48The best case is that **Psalm 97 reads like the public/cosmic fulfillment of the hope voiced at the end of Psalm 13**.
188313 → 962026-06-28T03:17:02Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-28T03:17:10If you wanted to argue that **Psalm 96 logically follows Psalm 13**, the strongest case is this:
188213 → 952026-06-27T03:16:56Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-06-27T03:17:09You could make a plausible case, but the case is **stronger on form, liturgical logic, and thematic progression** than on **rare shared vocabulary**. There are
188113 → 942026-06-26T03:18:01Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-26T03:18:11A plausible case is that **Psalm 94 reads like an expanded, communal/judicial sequel to Psalm 13**.
188013 → 932026-06-25T03:17:31Score 3.0 (v2) on 2026-06-25T03:17:47If you wanted to argue that Psalm 93 *logically follows* Psalm 13, the best case is **not** “these two psalms share lots of rare words.” They don’t. On a strict
187913 → 922026-06-24T03:17:09Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-24T03:17:26A good case can be made that **Psalm 92 reads like the fulfilled sequel to Psalm 13**: Psalm 13 is a short individual lament that ends in trust and a vow to sin
187813 → 912026-06-23T03:17:35Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-23T03:17:57Yes. If you wanted to argue that **Psalm 91 is a logical sequel to Psalm 13**, the best case is a **cumulative** one:
187713 → 902026-06-22T03:17:19Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-22T03:17:28A good case would be that **Psalm 90 reads like a theological and communal expansion of Psalm 13**. Psalm 13 is the **raw individual cry**; Psalm 90 takes the s
187613 → 892026-06-21T03:16:53Score 4.6 (v2) on 2026-06-21T03:17:05A strong case can be made that **Psalm 89 is a large-scale sequel to Psalm 13**: it takes the **individual Davidic lament** of Psalm 13 and **expands it into a
187513 → 882026-06-20T03:17:17Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-06-20T03:17:35A good case can be made that **Psalm 88 reads like an intensified sequel to Psalm 13**: it picks up Psalm 13’s central complaints and carries them further, espe
187413 → 872026-06-19T03:18:14Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-19T03:18:28On a **strict lexical basis**, Psalm 87 is **not** an especially strong sequel to Psalm 13: the two psalms do **not** share many rare, identical words. So if yo
187313 → 862026-06-18T03:17:49Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-18T03:18:04Yes. The case is not “Psalm 86 must depend on Psalm 13,” but you can make a good cumulative argument that **Psalm 86 reads like a developed sequel to Psalm 13**
187213 → 852026-06-17T03:16:43Score 3.0 (v2) on 2026-06-17T03:17:01A plausible case can be made, though the case is stronger on **form and thematic development** than on lots of rare shared lexemes.
187113 → 842026-06-16T03:17:14Score 4.2 (v2) on 2026-06-16T03:17:32A good case can be made, though the case is stronger **thematically and structurally** than by a dense cluster of rare shared words.
187013 → 832026-06-15T03:17:24Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-15T03:17:38A good case can be made, but it is mostly a case from **shared lament-patterns plus a cluster of medium-strength lexical links**, not from one overwhelming rare
186913 → 822026-06-14T03:18:12Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-06-14T03:18:33On strict lexical grounds, the link is **not especially dense**; Psalm 13 and Psalm 82 do not share a lot of rare vocabulary. But there is still a **good logica
186813 → 812026-06-13T03:17:16Score 4.7 (v2) on 2026-06-13T03:17:34A reasonable case can be made, especially if Psalm 81 is read as a **communal, liturgical answer** to the **individual lament** of Psalm 13.
186713 → 802026-06-12T03:17:02Score 4.7 (v2) on 2026-06-12T03:17:16You could make a decent case that **Psalm 80 is a communal expansion of the same lament logic found in Psalm 13**.
186613 → 792026-06-11T03:18:03Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-06-11T03:18:30A plausible case is that **Psalm 79 reads like a communal, intensified sequel to Psalm 13**.
186513 → 782026-06-10T03:19:19Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-10T03:19:45Yes. The best case is not that Psalm 13 and Psalm 78 are the same genre—they are not—but that **Psalm 78 reads like a large communal-historical expansion of the
186413 → 772026-06-09T03:19:01Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-06-09T03:19:15Yes. A pretty good case can be made that Psalm 77 reads like an expanded, deepened sequel to Psalm 13.
186313 → 762026-06-08T03:18:02Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-08T03:18:31If you wanted to argue that Psalm 76 “logically follows” Psalm 13, the best case is **cumulative**: not a huge number of rare identical words, but a strong **mo
186213 → 752026-06-07T03:17:37Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-07T03:17:50A good case can be made, though **more on structure and thematic progression than on rare shared vocabulary**.
186113 → 742026-06-06T03:19:15Score 4.6 (v2) on 2026-06-06T03:19:44A good case can be made that **Psalm 74 is a communal, intensified sequel to Psalm 13**. It is not that they are identical, but that Psalm 74 takes the same bas
186013 → 732026-06-05T03:19:33Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-06-05T03:19:48A good case can be made that **Psalm 73 is a logical sequel to Psalm 13**: Psalm 13 is the **short, urgent lament**, and Psalm 73 is the **longer, wiser re-proc
185913 → 722026-06-04T03:18:42Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-06-04T03:19:07A fair argument can be made, though mostly by **theme, form, and Davidic/Solomonic logic**, not by a dense cluster of rare shared words.
185813 → 712026-06-03T03:18:57Score 2.0 (v2) on 2026-06-03T03:19:21A good case can be made, but it is a **cumulative** case, not a slam-dunk based on rare shared vocabulary alone.
185713 → 702026-06-02T03:17:48Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-06-02T03:18:10Though Psalms 13 and 70 are not adjacent in the Masoretic order, you could still make a pretty good case that **Psalm 70 reads like a logical sequel or compress
185613 → 692026-06-01T03:18:50Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-06-01T03:19:18A reasonable case can be made that Psalm 69 reads like an **expanded, intensified sequel** to Psalm 13. I would not say the relationship is provable, but the cu
185513 → 682026-05-31T03:18:24Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-05-31T03:18:36You can make a plausible case that Psalm 68 is a kind of **expanded answer** to Psalm 13. The case is stronger in **theme, form, and sequence of events** than i
185413 → 672026-05-30T03:17:44Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-05-30T03:17:56The best case is that **Psalm 67 reads like the resolved, expanded answer to Psalm 13**.
185313 → 662026-05-29T03:18:18Score 4.7 (v2) on 2026-05-29T03:18:44A good case can be made, but mostly on **form and thematic progression**, with a few **solid lexical links**. The strongest argument is:
185213 → 652026-05-28T03:18:53Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-05-28T03:19:24The best case is that **Psalm 65 reads like the public, cultic fulfillment of the private resolve at the end of Psalm 13**.
185113 → 642026-05-27T03:18:06Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-05-27T03:18:26A plausible case can be made, though it is stronger on **form, motif, and reversal** than on a large number of shared rare lexemes.
185013 → 632026-05-26T03:18:52Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-05-26T03:19:04A good case can be made, but mainly as a **thematic and structural sequel**, not as a case of massive rare-word overlap.