Report generated on 2026-09-18 03:19:20 UTC.
| ID | Pair | Generated | Evaluation | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 14 → 28 | 2026-09-18T03:18:29 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-09-18T03:18:49 | A plausible case can be made that **Psalm 28 reads like a natural sequel to Psalm 14**. The strongest case is not just “same general mood,” but a set of fairly |
| 1963 | 14 → 27 | 2026-09-17T03:18:44 | Score 5.2 (v2) on 2026-09-17T03:19:03 | A plausible case can be made that **Psalm 27 reads like a fitting sequel to Psalm 14**: Psalm 14 describes a world in which no one seeks God, the wicked devour |
| 1962 | 14 → 26 | 2026-09-16T03:18:14 | Score 5.1 (v2) on 2026-09-16T03:18:36 | On a **strict rare-word / exact-form** basis, the link between Psalm 14 and Psalm 26 is **not especially tight**. The strongest case is not a catchword chain so |
| 1961 | 14 → 25 | 2026-09-15T03:17:31 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-09-15T03:17:46 | A plausible case can be made, though it is stronger at the level of **thematic/logical continuation** than of **dense verbatim reuse**. |
| 1960 | 14 → 24 | 2026-09-14T03:17:32 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-09-14T03:17:53 | Yes. The case would be cumulative rather than knock-down, but there are several good arguments that Psalm 24 can be read as a logical sequel to Psalm 14. |
| 1959 | 14 → 23 | 2026-09-13T03:17:51 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-09-13T03:18:04 | Yes. The best case is not “Psalm 23 shares lots of rare exact words with Psalm 14” — it does not — but rather that **Psalm 23 reads like the positive, personal |
| 1958 | 14 → 22 | 2026-09-12T03:18:26 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-09-12T03:18:37 | If I had to make the case, I would argue that **Psalm 14 sets up a problem that Psalm 22 dramatizes and resolves**. |
| 1957 | 14 → 21 | 2026-09-11T03:17:56 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-09-11T03:18:11 | Yes. The case is strongest if you read **Psalm 21 as the fulfillment of Psalm 14’s closing hope**. The links are not evenly distributed across both psalms; they |
| 1956 | 14 → 20 | 2026-09-10T03:17:40 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-09-10T03:17:56 | A good case can be made that **Psalm 20 functions as a natural sequel to Psalm 14**, especially if you treat **Ps 14:7** as the hinge. |
| 1955 | 14 → 19 | 2026-09-09T03:17:30 | Score 5.8 (v2) on 2026-09-09T03:17:46 | On **strict lexical grounds**, Psalm 14 → Psalm 19 is **not** the strongest “rare-word chaining” in the Psalter. There are not many rare, identical content-word |
| 1954 | 14 → 18 | 2026-09-08T03:17:53 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-09-08T03:18:10 | Yes. The best case is that **Psalm 18 reads like the answered version of Psalm 14**. |
| 1953 | 14 → 17 | 2026-09-07T03:17:28 | Score 5.5 (v2) on 2026-09-07T03:17:46 | A good case can be made that **Psalm 17 reads like the personal prayer of the “righteous/poor” group presupposed in Psalm 14**. In other words: |
| 1952 | 14 → 16 | 2026-09-06T03:17:14 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-09-06T03:17:26 | A plausible case is that Psalm 16 is the **individual, positive counterpart** to Psalm 14’s **communal diagnosis and hope**. |
| 1951 | 14 → 15 | 2026-09-05T03:17:42 | Score 5.8 (v2) on 2026-09-05T03:17:56 | Yes. A good case can be made that Psalm 15 is meant to read as a kind of sequel or answer to Psalm 14. |
| 1950 | 14 → 13 | 2026-09-04T03:17:50 | Score 5.2 (v2) on 2026-09-04T03:18:05 | If I had to argue that **Psalm 13 makes good sense after Psalm 14**, I’d make this case: |
| 1949 | 14 → 12 | 2026-09-03T03:17:20 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-09-03T03:17:29 | A good case can be made that **Psalm 12 works as a sequel to Psalm 14**: Psalm 14 gives the **diagnosis** of a godless human world, and Psalm 12 gives the **pra |
| 1948 | 14 → 11 | 2026-09-02T03:18:22 | Score 5.4 (v2) on 2026-09-02T03:18:37 | If you wanted to argue that **Psalm 11 naturally follows Psalm 14**, there is actually a pretty good case. The strongest case is not just “same general topic,” |
| 1947 | 14 → 10 | 2026-09-01T03:28:00 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-09-01T03:28:15 | Yes. The strongest case is that **Psalm 14 gives the compressed thesis**, and **Psalm 10 gives the expanded case-study**. |
| 1946 | 14 → 9 | 2026-08-31T03:18:07 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-08-31T03:18:22 | Yes. The strongest case is that **Psalm 14 ends with a wish**, and **Psalm 9 reads like the thanksgiving after that wish has been granted**. |
| 1945 | 14 → 8 | 2026-08-30T03:17:17 | Score 4.7 (v2) on 2026-08-30T03:17:31 | You can make a **reasonable case**, though not mainly on the basis of lots of rare identical words. The strongest case is a **clustered conceptual and lexical r |
| 1944 | 14 → 7 | 2026-08-29T03:17:24 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-08-29T03:17:38 | Yes. If you wanted to argue that Psalm 7 is a good *logical sequel* to Psalm 14, you could make a fairly strong case. |
| 1943 | 14 → 6 | 2026-08-28T03:17:32 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-08-28T03:17:42 | If you wanted to argue that **Psalm 6 naturally follows Psalm 14**, the best case is: |
| 1942 | 14 → 5 | 2026-08-27T03:17:58 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-08-27T03:18:21 | A good case can be made that **Psalm 5 works as a sequel to Psalm 14**: Psalm 14 gives the **diagnosis** of a corrupt world, and Psalm 5 gives the **prayer of t |
| 1941 | 14 → 4 | 2026-08-26T03:18:26 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-26T03:18:37 | Yes. A pretty good case can be made that Psalm 4 works as a logical sequel to Psalm 14. |
| 1940 | 14 → 3 | 2026-08-25T03:18:24 | Score 4.5 (v2) on 2026-08-25T03:18:51 | Yes. The case is not “lots of rare identical words,” but there is still a pretty good argument that **Psalm 3 can be read as a natural sequel to Psalm 14**. By |
| 1939 | 14 → 2 | 2026-08-24T03:18:08 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-24T03:18:24 | Yes. The case is not “proved” by one single smoking gun, but there is a pretty good cumulative argument that **Psalm 2 can be read as a logical sequel to Psalm |
| 1938 | 14 → 1 | 2026-08-23T03:18:04 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-23T03:18:24 | You can make a decent case, though the case is stronger thematically and structurally than by a dense cluster of rare shared words. |
| 1937 | 13 → 150 | 2026-08-22T03:17:23 | Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-08-22T03:17:33 | The best case is **not** a lexical one. Psalm 13 and Psalm 150 share almost no rare, identical vocabulary, so if you rank links by “rare exact word matches,” th |
| 1936 | 13 → 149 | 2026-08-21T03:18:05 | Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-08-21T03:18:25 | The strongest case is this: |
| 1935 | 13 → 148 | 2026-08-20T03:18:53 | Score 3.0 (v2) on 2026-08-20T03:19:04 | If you wanted to argue that Psalm 148 **logically follows** Psalm 13, the best case is **not** “they share lots of rare identical words.” They do not. The bette |
| 1934 | 13 → 147 | 2026-08-19T03:18:52 | Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-08-19T03:19:10 | The strongest case is **not** “these two psalms share lots of rare identical words.” They don’t. The strongest case is that **Psalm 147 reads like the answered, |
| 1933 | 13 → 146 | 2026-08-18T03:17:54 | Score 4.5 (v2) on 2026-08-18T03:18:14 | A good case can be made, though mostly as a **thematic and formal sequel**, not as a case of dense rare-word reuse. |
| 1932 | 13 → 145 | 2026-08-17T03:17:59 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-17T03:18:13 | A good case can be made, but the case is stronger at the level of **form, progression, and theology** than at the level of lots of rare shared vocabulary. |
| 1931 | 13 → 144 | 2026-08-16T03:17:12 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-16T03:17:21 | A plausible case can be made, though the case is stronger on **form and thematic progression** than on lots of rare shared vocabulary. |
| 1930 | 13 → 143 | 2026-08-15T03:18:02 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-08-15T03:18:15 | Yes. You can make a pretty good case that Psalm 143 is a natural literary sequel to Psalm 13. |
| 1929 | 13 → 142 | 2026-08-14T03:18:16 | Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-08-14T03:18:38 | A plausible case can be made that **Psalm 142 is a kind of fuller, more concrete sequel or reworking of Psalm 13**. The strongest arguments are not just “both a |
| 1928 | 13 → 141 | 2026-08-13T03:17:36 | Score 4.6 (v2) on 2026-08-13T03:18:00 | If you wanted to argue that **Psalm 141 is a plausible logical sequel to Psalm 13**, the best case is **cumulative** rather than resting on one knockout verbal |
| 1927 | 13 → 140 | 2026-08-12T03:17:29 | Score 6.0 (v2) on 2026-08-12T03:17:51 | If I were trying to argue that **Psalm 140 is a good logical successor to Psalm 13**, I’d build the case like this, moving from the strongest links to the weake |
| 1926 | 13 → 139 | 2026-08-11T03:18:08 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-11T03:18:24 | Yes. A good case can be made that **Psalm 139 reads like a theological sequel to Psalm 13**: Psalm 13 is the cry of someone who *feels* abandoned; Psalm 139 is |
| 1925 | 13 → 138 | 2026-08-10T03:17:28 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-10T03:17:46 | A good case can be made that **Psalm 138 reads like the “answered-prayer sequel” to Psalm 13**. |
| 1924 | 13 → 137 | 2026-08-09T03:17:59 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-09T03:18:08 | A good case can be made, though the link is stronger at the level of **shared roots, lament logic, and historical development** than at the level of many rare i |
| 1923 | 13 → 136 | 2026-08-08T03:17:11 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-08T03:17:20 | A plausible case can be made, though the link is stronger in **theme and form** than in a dense cluster of rare shared words. |
| 1922 | 13 → 135 | 2026-08-07T03:18:23 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-07T03:18:34 | On a **strict rare-word / exact-form basis**, the link from Psalm 13 to Psalm 135 is **not especially tight**. There are not many rare identical lexemes shared |
| 1921 | 13 → 134 | 2026-08-06T03:17:38 | Score 3.0 (v2) on 2026-08-06T03:17:54 | The best case is **not** a strong rare-word lexical chain. On purely lexical grounds, the link is fairly thin. But you can still make a **good form-critical and |
| 1920 | 13 → 133 | 2026-08-05T03:17:10 | Score 5.0 (v2) on 2026-08-05T03:17:20 | On a **strict lexical test**, Psalm 133 is **not** an especially close match to Psalm 13: most exact overlaps are very common words like **יהוה**, **כי**, **את* |
| 1919 | 13 → 132 | 2026-08-04T03:17:03 | Score 3.0 (v2) on 2026-08-04T03:17:14 | A good case can be made, though it is stronger at the level of **motif-clusters and liturgical logic** than at the level of lots of rare shared lexemes. |
| 1918 | 13 → 131 | 2026-08-02T03:17:27 | Score 4.0 (v2) on 2026-08-02T03:17:45 | A good case can be made that **Psalm 131 reads like the spiritual sequel to Psalm 13**: Psalm 13 is the voice of an agitated sufferer; Psalm 131 is the voice of |
| 1917 | 13 → 130 | 2026-08-01T03:17:46 | Score 3.0 (v2) on 2026-08-01T03:18:05 | If you use your weighting strictly, the case is **not** strongest at the level of rare shared vocabulary. There are only a few real Hebrew links, and most of th |
| 1916 | 13 → 129 | 2026-07-31T03:16:55 | Score 4.5 (v2) on 2026-07-31T03:17:11 | The strongest case is that **Psalm 129 reads like a corporate, answered version of Psalm 13**. |
| 1915 | 13 → 128 | 2026-07-30T03:18:05 | Score 4.8 (v2) on 2026-07-30T03:18:33 | If by “logically follows” you mean “makes good sense as the next step in a poetic/theological sequence,” then yes, a case can be made — though the case is much |